Simon Hunt Again Publishes his daughters details

Simon Hunt posts intimate details of his daughter including identifying information on Familylawwebguide.com.au:

	#25965
Points: 570 Joined: 16 May, 2007, 01:10 PM Primary group: Silver Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">vascopajama Silver Member	Marker Yes, its bizarre, but thats how these people operate. They take sides. They 'empathise' with the 'victim' Its all about assisting the one party generally the mother to condemn the father. After all these women think that men generally can't control there sexual urges to the extent that children aren't safe. I think they generally do interview the accused mainly to see if there is a confession in the offering. Perhaps they have already formed the view that this won't happen in your case. Or to see if you express any anger, which confirms your enemy status. I've been through all this and my poor little daughter was interrogated mercilessly, There were three different organisations including one that claimed to be treating her protective strategies. The fact that the allegations were found unsubstantiated meant nothing in the end. About the only hope you and your child have is getting a red hot barrister. Otherwise regardless of the outcome they will be unwilling to allow you access to your child due to the distress the mother is said to have endured and the stigma. In may case I wasn't even accused of sexual abuse, the allegation was that there might have been sexual abuse, based on me teaching my daughter how to XXXXXXXXXXXXXX and that my daughter had seen me XXXXX. I understand that the only way these dirty tactics get overturned is when a court is persuaded that there is deliberate alienation going on. However be careful never to mention the syndrome ie: PAS or you'll get nowhere. The fact that you haven't been interviewed might assist you in your case. I wish I had done this. The idea that all will be well once they find the allegations aren't substantiated is fanciful. "When your going through hell keep going" is about the only other advice I can offer. Perhaps you should start researching how the alienation defense has been used successfully in other cases. And remember litigation is about devastating the opponent. Don't let the fact that she the mother of your child allow you to be soft. Her lawyer certainly won't be going soft on you, and she probably would have lost control of the process long ago (or be in such a state that she is vulnerable easily manipulated). Unfortunately these stories don't have a happy endings. The best you can hope for is persuading the court that your ex is 'the abuser' to maximise your contact. Please contact me off list if you like. email.hunt@gmail.com

He had already previously posted her address and name contained in the DVO and went to Laurie Nowell at the Sun Herald with his bogus story which was printed in the newspapers. Simon Hunt also identified himself via the comments section of that same article affording his daughter even more shame. This is a classic example of how this man puts himself first constantly and he blames the courts for banning him from being around her? The courts were right in making the decision that he cannot see her until she is an adult..this man does not deserve the title of father!!
The familylawwebguide and the the Shared Parenting Counil by allowing these types of posts are condoning further child abuse.

Is Simon Hunt a bigger Idiot than Danny Bell??

We think so because he chooses to involve his child?


Simon Hunt gets this story printed by deceit in a Melbourne Newspaper and the newspaper fails to mention crucial specific details such as the decision was made by the County Court and it was for a breach of an intervention order. It had nothing to do with Family Law and Simon Hunt has repeatedly already breached this current order now by publishing details of it all over the internet and on familylawwebguide.com.au and now identifying himself and therefore his ex wife and daughter as well posting his ex wife's address all over the internet. We think it's time to alert the Victorian County Court in order to protect his child. Shame on you Simon Hunt and you say you love your child but you are willing to use her to further your own cause. No wonder they won't let you see her her, she needs to be protected from you!

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24761929-661,00.html

And this Gem Posted in The Comments Section

The mother is clearly emotionally unstable. She should relinquish all care to the father for the child's own safety.

Posted by: Neb-Maat-Re of Melbourne 3:40pm today
Comment 134 of 140

Hi "Steve" here. Thanks everybody for your support (especially the Herald Sun). Amazing how many people know whats going on despite the media's reluctance to report the issue and its willingness to publish the anti male, anti child "Family Violence" propaganda peddled by the Courts and government funded interest groups ("Stakeholders"). Thanks Jay for your suggestion. Unfortunately the Family Court specifically banned me from any attempt to communicate with my daughter. Phone calls, letters, emails, everything. I am only allowed to give her a card and present on her birthday and at Christmas, which are to be vetted by my X. Needless to say I never know if they are received. My darling daughter's loving father. Posted by: Simon Hunt of Mornington 3:33pm today
Comment 133 of 140

this is happening all too often these days. such a shame.

Posted by: Daniel of Frankston 2:22pm today
Comment 132 of 140

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/comments/0,22023,24761929-661,00.html


Simon Hunt is one of the original members of the Shared Parenting Council of Australia along with Sue Price and Matilda Bawden until they all had a falling out and those three were either kicked out or left. He goes by the user name Vascopajama on familylawwebguide.com.au.