Danytink/Danny/Donga/Dipstick posted confidential details of his mediation clients yet again on Familylawebguide.com.au
"I need to play the devils advocate in order to get a quick answer on this one.
A couple go to mediation and sign an Honourary Financial Agreement that is set out clearly and is worded according to the templates on the Family Law Website. The agreement outlines full indemnity operating both ways and it is sewn up pretty tightly in regards to future ownership and rights of the applicant and respondent.
This agreement is not filed in any court and it has not had a solicitor look over it or a certificate attached to it. The agreement is to do with the property of a separating/divorced couple.
Why is it not binding according to Family Law when any other agreement of it's kind in real estate or financial areas are? "
Given that Mandurah is not a very big town, and you don't have many clients, it would be easy to identify who these people are. You are breaching your code of ethics yet again.
And for the record, other agreements are not necessarily legally binding but then you wouldn't understand that either.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Mandurah would be a lot bigger than some of the towns in Tassie ETT!
Geoff is that a threat? Are you implying that you think we are from Tasmania? Moron! You guys all make the wildest assumptions based on what? Facts? It is the same all the way through the mens rights groups, some dipshit will post "gee all the men are having to sell their own houses because they have to pay child support" and the next thing you know it's all over the internet and the catchcry of ALL the mens groups. Some facts and good research go a long way. Try it!
Please take care.
A person claiming to speak for FLWG has incorrectly identified me as the writer of this blog.
That person has made both public and private threats against me and others, claiming to speak on behalf of FLWG.
I have satisfied a court that I am not the writer of this blog and a restraining order has been issued against the person who made the threats.
Any person making threats against me or publishing false accusations about me will be dealt with in the same way.
I understand another Tasmanian has also taken action against that same person as a result of threats and false accusations.
Please be very careful who you 'identify' as the author of this blog. Some people are prepared to take a reference to Tasmania as meaning you know something which you plainly don't and may not have intended but if those people act based on your error you may find yourself involved in legal action too.
A misunderstanding arose because somebody published an identification based on no evidence at all and another person took it as fact without taking the trouble to check for himself.
Please do not make the same mistake.
Remember, a court has been satisfied that I do not write this blog.
Please do not let rumour hold more weight than that. You may bring threats upon me and trouble upon yourself.
I will do whatever it takes to protect my family.
(Signed with initials because those who need to know will know what they stand for and those who don't need to know are better off not asking.)
KMC thank you for the clarification and for speaking out. We are sorry that you have had to experience the unnecessary stresses of dealing with these deranged individuals. As we stated,it starts as a whisper in these mens groups and then turns into a roar. We've also been advised that certain indivuals believe we are either Michael Flood or associated with him because we have a link to his website on the front of this blog. They have chosen to ignore the fact that we also have a links to other websites including familylawwebguide.
We have ignored the demands to identify ourselves only to avoid the threat to our own safety and to our familes and associates. Your situation clearly demonstrates that we are very wise indeed to take this action. Thank you for your concern and thank you for alerting us to the very real danger that is out there.
Post a Comment