One Million Bullies

"MICHAEL GREEN QC:" We'd lose again, a whole generation of separated children, in terms of their really healthy relationships with not only their fathers but their mothers too, and I know that separated groups, fathers' groups in particular, shared parenting groups can conjure up over a million votes and that's something that I think the Government will take into account."

http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2008/s2669191.htm


We say: Really?
When will the Shared Parenting Council of Australia and Michael Green ex husband, ex president ex everything, in particular realise that bullying by men and threats by fathers just will not work anymore? You might have been able to threaten the previous flaccid penis government but it isn't going to work anymore! You might have been able to bully your ex wives when you were married and push your kids around but no more.
The women and children of Australia are tired of your bullying. The people of Australia are tired of your bullying and the Government of Australia in particular is tired of your bullying.
The women and children and good men of Australia will gladly make up your numbers in votes for the Government and relegate you losers to the streets like you deserve. You've lost your funding, lost your suck up political allies and you are now the lepers of society. Change or be left behind. You give all good fathers a bad name.

Singlemum mistakes FamilyLawwebguide as actually meaning "Family"

Singlemum an apparently new user on Familylawebguide joined and participated in the forums only to be blasted by the dumbest of the dumb, Mike Taylor, Peter Saxon akak Conan and the stalwart a**hole Michael Green aka Agog/Sisyphus.

MikeT was the first flunky sent in to attack her point of view which was against deadbeat dads and fathers and grandparents whose only involvement in a childs life was abusive. MikeT posted his usual cut and paste from the CSA website and spouted off his usual pompous gibberish. Trouble is Mike we've read your blog and Tricia's comments about your son so we don't understand your high horse attitude. Maybe a move back to England might be in order because we don't like whinging Poms here.
(Google Trish's name if you want to find her blogs.)

Didn't the Familylawwebguide obtain their funding by claiming to be a "Family" resource and the websites own front page says it is for all parents. Why was Singlemum attacked and threatened with a banning because her views don't conform to your misogynistic ones? You just proved the site is only man friendly and proved that you obtained your Government funding by deception and fraud. The current investigation will force you to pay it back to the Commonwealth.

MIchael Green says silly and ill conceived strategies not tolerated.

globalman
	Posted Today, 09:12 AM #26108
Points: 1,600 Joined: 08 January, 2008, 12:48 AM Primary group: Master_Editor ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">Sisyphus Master Editor	Marker globalman was typical of the dogmatic types that occasionally arrive on this site. They find the FLWG and immediately realise they have a very large audience to propagate their strange political, legal and religious views and blast away without any care. His ideas and strategies were at total variance with accepted norms both in society and the Courts. Suggesting silly and ill conceived strategies that would lead others into making fools of themselves in Court is not tolerated on this site. Globalman has claimed a dubious record on this site. 12 posts in less than 24 hours, the majority of which were removed by the moderators. He also received 8 warnings in less than 12 hours which is another record. Faced with an additional avalanche of moderator warnings and complaints by members of the FLWG his membership on this site was terminated. FLWG and the moderators respect the right of robust comment and discussion but it will not allow fools and charlatans to peddle their wares. Senior Site Moderator and Administrator

WE applaud this move and now expect Michael Green/Agog/Sisyphus to remove all references endorsing Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) made by Lindsay Jackel/Matrix/Dad4life and Wayne Butler/Oneringrules from www.familylawwebguide.com.au. As proven, PAS is a junk science and is pushed as a tool by men seeking to disguise their abuse of families. It was named by Richard Gardner a pro pedophile self publishing doctor who committed suicide by disembowelling himself in his kitchen (as if that guy didn't have some serious shit going down.)

Michael Green an expert on Violent Behaviours After Separation

Wayne Butler crows on familylawwebguide:

	#25907
Points: 27,200 Joined: 02 August, 2006, 10:11 PM Primary group: Percolo Alio FLWG Closed VOIP Telephone: 114888 ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">Secretary SPCA Percolo Alio	Marker dazza said Does anyone have any idea how having an AVO hanging over you would affect your right to 50/50 shared care? In respect to courts read up on Shared Parental Responsibility. If you don't get over that threshold it makes it harder for significant contact and you cannot automatically go on to 65DAA equal or substantial time. That is at court. You are in Mediation. The threat of an AVO is one thing but to have one is another. If you have proceedings under way in a Families Court and there is an AVO proceeding it is not significant until there is actually an AVO in place . Then it becomes an issue. The other side will most likely use it against you in any proceedings. Why not? as another court has already determined you are a violent person or otherwise why would they have issued the AVO.... It is interesting reading some of Michael Green's material and other specialists on the different sorts of violent behaviours after separation. Often much is frustration, hostile words, which can lead to more serious physical violence. Step back and take a deep breath. Mediation is the best place to be and make a genuine effort to resolve issues.

We ask when did Michale Green become such an expert on violent behaviours after separation. Was it due to his own experience as we are in receipt of information that says Michael Green has no formal qualification whatsoever in psychology, sociology of psychiatry. What makes him an EXPERT? Is it in his practise of mediation where he fails to declare hs obvious bias towards fathers and men? We are very happy to see the recent changes to accreditation and intend to raise this issue with the AG's office.

Lies lies lies from Familylawwebguide

From Familylawwebguide...
"Applications are considered by the SRL-R Execs and not the site moderators. " in response to a post by MOOT as to why he wasn't being let in the door to SRL hallowed ground.

Hahahaha The Site Moderators and the controlling members of SRL are one and the same...Michael Green, Wayne Butler, Lindsay Jackel et al and all the Shared Parenting gang.
Why you keep peddling the same old bullshit that they are all separate entities is laughable as no-one is buying that garbage anymore?

Michael Green posts SRL applicants private information for all to read

BestIntersts JohnMcXXXXer
	Posted Yesterday, 10:15 PM #24335
Points: 26,265 Joined: 27 October, 2006, 08:53 PM Primary group: Percolo Alio FLWG Closed VOIP Telephone: 123456 ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">Agog Percolo Alio	Marker Emails and then two mobile calls and I spoke with him for an hour this evening. Has a mention on Wednesday. Had to go over very basic stuff for the hearing. Melbourne FMC case. Is applying to join. Any comments? Hi I emailed you last night from the sit requesting any assistance you may be able to give. I have a court date in Maqgistrates Court on this�Wenesday. I have attached my affadavit and intiating application to this email for you to have a look at. I am representing myself. The thing I wanted to know was if on the day both parties agree to most things in the interim orders can we put those into interim consent orders and then can I have the judge just rule on the items in dispute. I have requested a family consultant do a report and also that a lawyer be appointed to represent the childs best interests. As I have put forward interim and final orders and the main thrust of it is that in the interim the childs contact with me be reinstatedthat has been happening fotr the last 10 months. And the the expert�do a family report for the final hearing.�Thanks and I realise you may not be able to help this time as such short notice but I will continue to correspond with you as case goes on. I think this will be a great resource for me. My member name is " bestinterests" on the website. Thanks again Hi , I only just found your site and it seems a awesome and just what I was looking for. I wanted to enquire if you can have a look at my Iniating Application and Affidavit . I filed them on 30th of April and have my first court date on 8th of May in the Federal Magistrates Court. I know its last minute but any help now and through out the case would be much help. I spent a total of 6 days straight typing and researching the law to come up with what I did and realise it could have been done better. But none the less I have been as through and honest as I can.If you can have a look before then and give me any feedback that would be great. I also wanted to know I have applied for interim orders and final orders. On the court date if both parties agee on the majority of the interim orders can we ask for them to be made into consent orders and ask the Judge to rule on the items in dispute. The items im sure the other party will not agree on are 1. Asking that the childs best interests be represented by a lawyer and that a family consultant be instructed to prepare a family report. These two things I feel are important for gathering evidence and the childs best interests being represented at the final hearing. I have read all relevant rules and guidelines for the site and like the idea of being able to assist others where I can as I do a lot of volunteer work already.I will send the affidavit and application to my personal space as recommended. Understand it may be too late this time but hope you can help with further appearances as I will be a self represented litigant throughout the the entire process, Thanks (He actually sent the emails back to front - he misspelled an email address) Attachment » Download: Best Interests Application 040509.rtf (576 Kb, 2 downloads so far) Attachment » Download: Best Interests Affidavit 040509.doc (126 Kb, 1 downloads so far) Senior Executive Member of SRL-Resources
	,

"> Forum root > New site visitors questions and answers



This forum post along with a completed Affidavit containing all parties names, addresses and identifying details, and Application forms were posted in the full view of the public on www.familylawwebguide.com.au on 4th May and was in direct contravention of S121 which restricts publication of any document identifying parties in a family law matter. Details of "Bestinterests" child, relatives and ex partner were all provided.

Apart from the serious breach of S121 , the information posted proves that Michael Green alias Agog alias Sisyphus is also practising law without a certificate from the NSW Bar Association.


As per our previous warnings not to join the SRL as they use the information inappropriately and all they want are your details. Don't forget about their "special" relationship with the CSA that Wayne Butler brags about constantly.

Oneadadc aka Graeme Campbell and member of the SRL urges any new users to:


"For a start, join Self Represented Litigants - Resources (SRL-R) for a chance to discuss in private and gat some usefull guidance on the process."


This is what they do with CONFIDENTIAL information!!! BEWARE of the Self Represented Litigants Group, they are only members of the Shared Parenting Council of Australia and if you want an angry mens group sharing your information with everyone on the internet, feel free to join up.
We have sent a copy of what was posted to the Federal Magistrates Court including the affidavits.

SPCA publish and condone cheating to avoid Child Support

The Shared Parenting Council members including Michael Green, Wayne Butler and Barry Williams have the following advice published on their website, familylawwebguide where they advise payers of Child Support to use "foul means" to resist responding to a Change Of Assessment for Child Support payable to support their children.

	Posted 13 April, 2009, 08:48 PM #24004
Points: 2,110 Joined: 24 May, 2008, 11:04 PM Primary group: Silver Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">Bigred Silver Member	Marker I put all my requests etc to them in writing and they try hard to do everything by phone. My advice to anyone reading here is do business by mobile phone and PO box number. Only concede what you wnat them to know and challenge every decision because there is usually a more advantageous position they want admit to. And never instigate a COA, and if one has been started on you resist it by whatever fair or foul means you can find. And keep your CSA paymnets up to date if you can - because when you win on a point, a refund cheque is a badge of honour.

Familylawwebguide hates MOTHERS!!!

Now that you've lost the funding why don't you all drop the facade? You don't have to pretend that you're a "Family" website anymore or are you all afraid that you will have to REPAY the funding due to the fraudulent applications and desperately trying to maintain that you are for fathers AND mothers when everybody knows that was garbage?
For every mother that posts for advice or help on that site (www.familylawwebguide.com.au which is a front for Mens Rights group Shared Parenting Council of Australia) there is only derision or blame. Every woman on there that isn't a stepmother is treated with disdain and AGOG (Michael Green ex QC and current woman hating mediator), OneRingRules (secretary of SPCA and has been accused of child sexual abuse so he hates all women as well) and then MikeT (alias the patronising and blind Mike Taylor) are the key players followed up by D4E (aka Padwithwings) with his whining "well it's your job to encourage the child to go to the abusers" attitude. D4Life aka extremely bitter and twisted Lindsay jackel because his wife left him for a lesbian follows in the rear with his nasty attitude. Conan,who is Peter Saxon has a particularly nasty attitude (and we all know what's in his past to make him like that!) is a poster that is sent in to go for the mother's jugular why they all stand around laughing.

Have you all not got the point by now, you can't INSIST that everyone who comes to the site has to read the entire thing. You obviously think your bullying can carry over into the cyber realm and have no comprehension of what is expected of a forum. The patronising "well you obviously haven't read through the site before you posted" garbage posted by Michael Green is extremely tedious and can only be construed as bullying. You have been accused numerous times of being arrogant and rude, maybe it's time to heed the warnings. You assume responsibility for the site in the guise of AGOG and SISYPHUS then you must also assume responsibility for how members are treated and should be ashamed of yourself.


http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/pg/topicview/misc/3603/index.php&start=0&keep_session=1415661365#first_unread

http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/pg/topicview/misc/3589/index.php&start=0&keep_session=1415661365#first_unread


http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/pg/topicview/misc/3612/index.php&start=0&keep_session=1415661365#post_22871


http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/pg/topicview/misc/1876/index.php&start=0&keep_session=1415661365#first_unread