http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/index.php?page=topicview&type=misc&id=2532&start=0#first_unread
This post was edited to include the fact that Monty AND Agog provided legal advice to a gentleman. Previously it stated that it was Monty that helped the person concerned. Did Agog send you a scathing message to make you edit the post Monty?
Where is Agog's licence to provide legal advice?
Saturday, August 9, 2008
Friday, August 8, 2008
Gee Thanks Wayne.
Wayne wrote to all users to help explain what a word meant as we all know all of the readers of that forum are just stupid dolts who couldn't google for the life of them:
Wayne ORR wrote
"I post for clarity a definition of Hyperbole....Hyperbole is a figure of speech which is an exaggeration. Persons often use expressions such as "I nearly died laughing," "I was hopping mad," and "I tried a thousand times." Such statements are not literally true, but people make them to sound impressive or to emphasize something, such as a feeling, effort, or reaction. Hyperboles are common in everyday language and in poetry."
http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/index.php?page=topicview&type=misc&id=2086&start=20#post_16349
The funny thing is Wayne had to google it himself and obviously didn't know what it was either as what he wrote/cut and pasted comes directly from this page. LMAO
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive/index.php/t-225537.html
Wayne ORR wrote
"I post for clarity a definition of Hyperbole....Hyperbole is a figure of speech which is an exaggeration. Persons often use expressions such as "I nearly died laughing," "I was hopping mad," and "I tried a thousand times." Such statements are not literally true, but people make them to sound impressive or to emphasize something, such as a feeling, effort, or reaction. Hyperboles are common in everyday language and in poetry."
http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/index.php?page=topicview&type=misc&id=2086&start=20#post_16349
The funny thing is Wayne had to google it himself and obviously didn't know what it was either as what he wrote/cut and pasted comes directly from this page. LMAO
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive/index.php/t-225537.html
Get over it Lindsay!
Dad4life/Lindsay bleated:
I, for one, do not welcome the C$A to this site, nor their participation. If my will were to prevail, it would be otherwise.
I despise any organisation that forcibly takes money from innocent people who have committed no crime. What the C$A does is theft and extortion using mafia-like standover techniques and tactics. I hurt no one and committed no crime. Because of the actions of another person I was forced to pay money to the Australian federal government via its C$A. I will not forget nor forgive that extortion and theft. Nor the harm and hurt done to thousands of innocent fathers over the years.
We say:
So you're the deadbeat Dad everyone is talking about! Loser! So your wife ran off with a woman, get over it! Move on! Build a bridge! Get a life! Your daughter is over 18 now so you don't even pay child support. And Lindsay, although you pay the money to the government, I'm not sure if you know this bu they pay it to your ex wife so she can maintain your daughter. It is called parental responsibility, do you understand now? And we all know you don't want the CSA on FLWG, or women, or non christians, or homosexuals right?
I, for one, do not welcome the C$A to this site, nor their participation. If my will were to prevail, it would be otherwise.
I despise any organisation that forcibly takes money from innocent people who have committed no crime. What the C$A does is theft and extortion using mafia-like standover techniques and tactics. I hurt no one and committed no crime. Because of the actions of another person I was forced to pay money to the Australian federal government via its C$A. I will not forget nor forgive that extortion and theft. Nor the harm and hurt done to thousands of innocent fathers over the years.
We say:
So you're the deadbeat Dad everyone is talking about! Loser! So your wife ran off with a woman, get over it! Move on! Build a bridge! Get a life! Your daughter is over 18 now so you don't even pay child support. And Lindsay, although you pay the money to the government, I'm not sure if you know this bu they pay it to your ex wife so she can maintain your daughter. It is called parental responsibility, do you understand now? And we all know you don't want the CSA on FLWG, or women, or non christians, or homosexuals right?
Thursday, August 7, 2008
More Whitewashing on FLWG.
What has happened to all of the posts by LifeInsight? Why were they all deleted? Did it have anything to do with the fact that the Child Support Agency joined as a member and Lifeinsight had put too much out there how he was actively trying to avoid paying Child Support? How he made dollars and still only paid $50 per week in support for his child in WA? Lucky we have copies of all his posts!
Also does the CSA involvement have anything to do with OneRingRules/Wayne Butler/Sec SPCA edited everybodies posts and making them more aligned to their views?
So much for free speech and no censorship! That site Familylawwebguide is just a carefully crafted testimony to Shared Parenting/Mens Issues!
Also does the CSA involvement have anything to do with OneRingRules/Wayne Butler/Sec SPCA edited everybodies posts and making them more aligned to their views?
So much for free speech and no censorship! That site Familylawwebguide is just a carefully crafted testimony to Shared Parenting/Mens Issues!
Monday, August 4, 2008
Some Handy Links
Michael Greens Mediation Page
http://www.michaelgreenmediation.com/index.htm
Wayne Butler/Oneringrules
http://profiles.yahoo.com/oneringrulesit
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A2RPTKIOSHC4XS
http://www.michaelgreenmediation.com/index.htm
Wayne Butler/Oneringrules
http://profiles.yahoo.com/oneringrulesit
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A2RPTKIOSHC4XS
Sunday, August 3, 2008
Wayne's Baggage.
http://wopared.parl.net/house/committee/fca/childcustody/subs/sub0336.pdf
There are some key statements in your submission Wayne that make it very hard to believe that you remain impartial and have a balanced view of shared parenting. It is very apparent that you are a woman hater and as you are Site director of FamilyLawWebGuide.com.au how you can still try to maintain that you are fair minded is not believeable in the slightest.
"The current Family Law Act and its draconian contact arrangements are in my personal experience and complete and abysmal failure to many Dads"
"Many Dads appear to be unable to make it through to Family Court due to the time involved and the very significant costs."
"Often its the mother who walks away and forces the father out."
"Accusations are often fabricated by mothers..."
On Child Support: "I would say it allows the mother to spend more on herself than on the children".
Then you even get your parents to have a whinge as well and think everything revolves around them and the fact they live in New Zealand might just be a contributing factor?.
http://wopared.parl.net/house/committee/fca/childcustody/subs/sub0356.pdf
There are some key statements in your submission Wayne that make it very hard to believe that you remain impartial and have a balanced view of shared parenting. It is very apparent that you are a woman hater and as you are Site director of FamilyLawWebGuide.com.au how you can still try to maintain that you are fair minded is not believeable in the slightest.
"The current Family Law Act and its draconian contact arrangements are in my personal experience and complete and abysmal failure to many Dads"
"Many Dads appear to be unable to make it through to Family Court due to the time involved and the very significant costs."
"Often its the mother who walks away and forces the father out."
"Accusations are often fabricated by mothers..."
On Child Support: "I would say it allows the mother to spend more on herself than on the children".
Then you even get your parents to have a whinge as well and think everything revolves around them and the fact they live in New Zealand might just be a contributing factor?.
http://wopared.parl.net/house/committee/fca/childcustody/subs/sub0356.pdf
Saturday, August 2, 2008
What are you talking about Wayne??
Today
OneRingRules wrote in response to NXUS and Lifeinsight asking about the site FLWG and exactly what it is and who it is:
Site director
nxus said
- makes me wonder if this is a "guide", a "lobby group" or a "public forum" The Portal is a facility for all "Lobby", "Harm prevention" and "Support" groups involved in Family Law reforms, Child support reforms, and legislative reforms around all facets of law and circumstances that impact on families after separation. There have been countless topics about this Portal covered in a number of forums. Have you used the "HELP" button to check out the contacts etc? (See right hand menu on front page) Have you been around the forum topics and used the specialist forum search engine to find any topics on the Portal?
LifeInsight said
What amazes me about FLWG is the secrecy and mystery about it's existence. There is no "about"; "who we are" page listing all the people that have developed and maintain the site. If all these people are known, then why are they not given any credit on here. Why the secrecy? There is no secrecy and mystery. There is an about page, site map and much more in the help sections. There are thousands upon thousands of pages, sections, open forums and secured closed forums for private "Business", so you will not see everything here without having approipriate security permissions for some groups. The developers do not seek any credit, they are like you, having been through family law and child support matters and looking to create a fair and equitable system for those who do not get a fair go. As developers we cannot change the system because that is a job for the lobby groups. What we can do is deliver a platform for those that wish to use it and have a proper dialogue.The platform is not yet completed. We are about 30% through what is a very big development project and fortunately we have had additional developers join us along the way. We are also fortunate to have the Shared Parenting Council and the SRL-Resource groups believe in the Portal as one of the fundamental building blocks to allow the reform movement to get traction as a unified voice. Without the two groups we could not have possibly got to where we are today with around 1.5 Million hits a month and in excess of 500,000 pages viewed.
Hang on a minute! Aren't Oneringrules FLWG Site Director and Wayne Butler the Executive Secretary of the Share Parenting Council one and the same and Michael Green the President of SPCA and Sisyphus and Agog Moderators on FLWG also the same people? Oh yes they are! Did you forget that Wayne when you were congratulating yourselves. Do you think you are fooling anyone....the FLWG is the SPCA. Silly Wayne!
OneRingRules wrote in response to NXUS and Lifeinsight asking about the site FLWG and exactly what it is and who it is:
Site director
nxus said
- makes me wonder if this is a "guide", a "lobby group" or a "public forum" The Portal is a facility for all "Lobby", "Harm prevention" and "Support" groups involved in Family Law reforms, Child support reforms, and legislative reforms around all facets of law and circumstances that impact on families after separation. There have been countless topics about this Portal covered in a number of forums. Have you used the "HELP" button to check out the contacts etc? (See right hand menu on front page) Have you been around the forum topics and used the specialist forum search engine to find any topics on the Portal?
LifeInsight said
What amazes me about FLWG is the secrecy and mystery about it's existence. There is no "about"; "who we are" page listing all the people that have developed and maintain the site. If all these people are known, then why are they not given any credit on here. Why the secrecy? There is no secrecy and mystery. There is an about page, site map and much more in the help sections. There are thousands upon thousands of pages, sections, open forums and secured closed forums for private "Business", so you will not see everything here without having approipriate security permissions for some groups. The developers do not seek any credit, they are like you, having been through family law and child support matters and looking to create a fair and equitable system for those who do not get a fair go. As developers we cannot change the system because that is a job for the lobby groups. What we can do is deliver a platform for those that wish to use it and have a proper dialogue.The platform is not yet completed. We are about 30% through what is a very big development project and fortunately we have had additional developers join us along the way. We are also fortunate to have the Shared Parenting Council and the SRL-Resource groups believe in the Portal as one of the fundamental building blocks to allow the reform movement to get traction as a unified voice. Without the two groups we could not have possibly got to where we are today with around 1.5 Million hits a month and in excess of 500,000 pages viewed.
Hang on a minute! Aren't Oneringrules FLWG Site Director and Wayne Butler the Executive Secretary of the Share Parenting Council one and the same and Michael Green the President of SPCA and Sisyphus and Agog Moderators on FLWG also the same people? Oh yes they are! Did you forget that Wayne when you were congratulating yourselves. Do you think you are fooling anyone....the FLWG is the SPCA. Silly Wayne!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
