Thursday, July 24, 2008

Let's Talk About Artemis

Where do we start?
Current and previous status: Woman, mother of 2 boys, lives with partner, who has multiple maladies, he gets and uses Legal Aid and he has a child for whom he pays $6 a week CS and of course the partners ex wife is just terrible and so unfair and always causing trouble blah blah blah, got the baby bonus for her last child but didn't say no thanks or offer to give it back, receives very generous Child Support now from her own ex husband, gets Centrelink payments as well as works full time and is an expert on absolutley everything, you name it she's done it or if she hasn't then she's the "Google Queen". She loves loves loves to suck it up with all the boys on that site and they love her because she puts women down all the time (well only after the boys have as she doesn't have the gonads to speak up first). Down go the single mothers, down go the women, down go the feminazis, they all deserve her scorn.

Hold on a minute....did she somehow forget about what she is and what she does?
Artemis try googling the word HYPOCRITE!

How Embarassing Mr Agog!!!

Agog wrote today:

'MikeT and othersGTF is on here to have a stir. New user cherry picking some of the postings! The recent SPCA conference had 2 Mums there as SPCA Executives. We should also forget that Coral Slattery (a Mum) was with Michael Green and the Secretary of the SPCA at a closed meeting with the AG. As regards groups that are on this portal -lets see -well FLRA is headed by a Mum, SRL-R is non gender and Mothers 4 Equality is ahem (no surprise) run by a Mum -so where does GTF gets this viewpoint?Then again if GTF really is in Tassie a quick check through IP Addreses might reveal GTF is an old user returning under a new user name?Ah - the great wonders of the sites security and statistical software that can tell us many things!"


Mr Agog, does it feel strange to refer to yourself in third person in a post? You might be able to trade stories with Lindsay over that one as he does it regularly. hehehe
Mr Agog you're also embarassing yourself a lot although I don't think you realise it. When you crow about knowing where the IP came from, it doesn't mean that you have superior internet skills, superior site security or even statistical software you ninny. Any idiot can access your IP address. You're showing just how ignorant you are. Embarassing? Yes, very! And for the record, the IP address doesn't come from anyone here.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

They're still hiding behind the "It's a Portal" facade.

D4E says:
"Although informative getthefacts you have forgotten that this is a portal for many different groups that offer support in many differing ways so in essence it does welcome parents you've highlighted areas that can easily be taken out of context with the conversation. "


Well not exactly D4E:

The "portal" was set up by Shared Parenting Council of Australia which is a Mens group. Then you have in the "community" CRCkids.org.au which doesn't even exist and is a name only that is affiliated through the USA site which was set up by Lionel Richards who was Shared Parenting Council Aust. Mens group.
Then you have Mothers4Equality grandly welcomed to the "community" except they don't exist either and were set up by the SPCA with Debbie at the head who is an avid member of Fathers4Equality. Mens Group.
Then there is Family Law Reform Ass with John and Coral, which is just another front for mens rights. Mens group.
Then Dads on The Air is also part of the community (with most of the same members). Mens group.

They're all in bed together, despite deperately trying to create an impression that they are all independent "Portal" and they don't control what is going on. From what appears on the website, this is more of an excuse not to remove some of the more offensive posts on the site.
No wonder nobody takes any of you seriously, do you really think people are that dammed stupid?

Where is the Certificate from the NSW Bar?

It seems there are a few people practising law on there without the appropriate paperwork....hmmm.

Agog/Michael/Sisyphus admits:

"Many people join SRL-R with an expectation we are going to do 100% for them and are often not prepared to help themselves. Some people give us highly selective versions of their cases and waste much of our time 'pulling teeth'. If they were paying a solicitor $300-400 an hour would they do the same?D4L has made a number of postings about 'paying it forward' and trying to help yourself. You might be very surprised at how many people expect 20, 30 40 or more than a hundred hours of time and seem unable to grasp that the time and other out of pocket expenses has to come from somewhere. In terms of reciprocation and donations it has always been a 'hot' internal topic amongst the SRL-R people. You will note I use the term 'reciprocation' and I use it in the sense that you do not have to know anything or very much about Family Law to help us, there are many ancillary tasks that can be performed to make the SRL-R Execs time at the coalface more efficient. "

Then OneringRules/SSPCA/Wayne offers this confirmation in the same thread:

"The donations are received by FLWG. Funds are used for any worthy cause applied for on a case by case basis from any member group. To date there has not been a significant amount and any funds have been used in the development center to fund bandwidth and external developer resources. The site developers can give you more info if required. "



Does this mean you are all expecting some sort of compensation in exchange for legal advice? I hope not because as SRL's you would all know that that is against the law.

Read All About it!! Jackel admits to Mens Group!!

It's a big day today!
Finally an admission by one of the founding members of Familylawwebguide.com.au that it is fact a group for fathers. Not a "portal", not a "parents group" but a MENS GROUP!!! Like we didn't already know it!



Testing-one-two said:
I think you may be referring to a different site. This is not a Dad's site. There are plenty of them out there. This site is for SRLs, separated parents, their partners, grandparents, and family members regardless of their gender. Correct?


Dad4life/Matrix/Lindsay replied:
No. You are incorrect. I was quite definitely referring to this site.Dads are more than welcome here. And believe it or not, Dads have rights too.The courts and the legal system (lawyers included ... "shadow of the law") are far more biased against fathers and, contrary to your misunderstanding and mischaracterisation, there are far fewer places, safe places, for separated fathers than there are for mothers.

Lindsay will be taken out the back and severely chastised by the likes of Wayne, Michael et al.
Enjoy Lindsay!

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Dumb and Dumber!!!

vascopajama asked on FLWG:

I've just been served with an intervention order. It says I'm not allowed to use electronic means to to any person relating to the person/s protected by this order.Does that mean I'm not allowed to seek help here ..or on the telephone?




monster thoughtfully replied:


What? Someone off this site served you an intervention order? Thats the only reason you not be allowed to contact this site.Do the orders would have a explanation sheet attacthed saying how you are act to satisfy them? If you have been using this site to harass, stalk or bully someone and they feel intimidated you shouldnt be on the site cause that will contravene your order>. Other than that you should be able to get advice from the site like anyone else.Here is a legal aid resources about responding to the order. http://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/Publications/cl.res_eng.pdfSeriously whats going on? Are you allright?

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Good Calibre of Posters FLWG!! NOT!!!

(s)truth posted on Familylawwebguide.com.au:

"I do that as well, just to keep her on her toes.I puts in lots of change applications and object to everthing even when I know she is telling the truth like the school fees but she just gets copies of the forms I signed from the school.At least it keeps her having to respond and one day she will just give up and let me off.Keep it up mate. "

and then these gems from the same poster (s)truth...

"I had the kids on purpose but you are right sbout them being anoying when you are out etc so when I had enough I made a choice to just walk out the door.I am working on getting out of the money thing because I agree with you a man should not have to keep paying once he changes his mind,"

Who said there weren't any deadbeat Dads?