Sunday, November 2, 2008

Another "wronged Father"???

http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/index.php?page=topicview&type=misc&id=3060&start=0#first_unread

This was posted by MR Cut and Paste, Lindsay.
Some questions we have Lindsay from a different perspective that what you are considering:

  1. Why didn't he use reliable contraceptive in the first place to prevent an unwanted pregnancy?
  2. Why did he not become responsible for the child for at least 5 years?
  3. Did he contribute financially for that child at any time or leave it up to the mother?
  4. Did he contribute in any way to that child at all, in any way?
  5. Why did the court rule that he could not "have possession" of his child?
  6. Why is his donation of an organ reliant on his own imposed conditions? Surely the love for a child is unconditional?
  7. Why did his new wife choose to use the discrimination based on race card when it was not demonstrated at all?
  8. Why did his new wife choose to move away from her children that she was "so close to" to another continent?
  9. Why is there any dilemma at all whether he choose to donate the organ or not, people do itall of the time? To strangers even, without trying to impose conditions.

Lot and lots of holes in the story but don't let that get in the way when trying to tell a story about another "wronged father". The only victim here is that child and maybe one day he will live long enough to read what his father is saying about him in the newspapers. Shame on him and shame on you!

No comments: