Singlemum mistakes FamilyLawwebguide as actually meaning "Family"

Singlemum an apparently new user on Familylawebguide joined and participated in the forums only to be blasted by the dumbest of the dumb, Mike Taylor, Peter Saxon akak Conan and the stalwart a**hole Michael Green aka Agog/Sisyphus.

MikeT was the first flunky sent in to attack her point of view which was against deadbeat dads and fathers and grandparents whose only involvement in a childs life was abusive. MikeT posted his usual cut and paste from the CSA website and spouted off his usual pompous gibberish. Trouble is Mike we've read your blog and Tricia's comments about your son so we don't understand your high horse attitude. Maybe a move back to England might be in order because we don't like whinging Poms here.
(Google Trish's name if you want to find her blogs.)

Didn't the Familylawwebguide obtain their funding by claiming to be a "Family" resource and the websites own front page says it is for all parents. Why was Singlemum attacked and threatened with a banning because her views don't conform to your misogynistic ones? You just proved the site is only man friendly and proved that you obtained your Government funding by deception and fraud. The current investigation will force you to pay it back to the Commonwealth.

This is Hysterical!!!

See Conan/Peter Saxon/aka small man cut down to size!!!! It seems Isy has summed you up Conan in a very brief period and many people share his view not only of you but of the whole www.familylawwebguide site. And your traffic figure is another thing you lie about...we have seen Wayne and Michael Green brag about figures of 1,000,000 hits a month when the actual figure (easily accessed via the net and various sources) are only 1,500 hits per day which is not even 100,000 per month. We figure you have to justify the spending of Australian Government money somehow and none of you can tell the truth. Which brings us to another issue, we believe that the funding you did obtain was gained through dishonesty and we intend to follow this through. We believe you should be made to pay back the funds you have misapropriated from the Australian people and it is our mission to ensure that you do.
As snarly as you have lost ground now that they are winding back the changes to Family Law, you sure will be a lot grumpier then.

Points: 300 Joined: 05 June, 2009, 06:48 AM Primary group: Bronze Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">isy Bronze Member	Marker Actually, I have enjoyed u site but time to go. I am under the impression, but not because of this thread, that u family law weguide community in the main is on the side of the judges and the lawyers, over and above the people.. The family law reform asssoc appears as a way to promote get a lawyer. Your self rep section is not open to view, etc. etc.. Thanks guys bye. ps, how do I remove my details of email, password etc..
	Posted Yesterday, 06:14 PM #25859
Points: 1,815 Joined: 16 February, 2007, 07:38 PM Primary group: Silver Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">Conan Silver Member	Marker isy said Actually, I have enjoyed u site but time to go. I am under the impression, but not because of this thread, that u family law weguide community in the main is on the side of the judges and the lawyers, over and above the people. What a daft thing to say, how on Earth can you make such an absurd comment? Perhaps balanced posts are not your thing? isy said The family law reform asssoc appears as a way to promote get a lawyer. Have you ever been to an FLRA meeting? Another preposterous statement! isy said Your self rep section is not open to view, etc. etc.. The self rep area can be joined, they have private areas to protect the posters, surely you managed to read that? I would like to know if you ever took the SRL-R Quiz and the result because that would show us just how much you really don't know! isy said Thanks guys bye. ps, how do I remove my details of email, password etc.. I think the real reason is that you have come onto this site dispensing outmoded concepts, soap boxing (10,000 matters) and realize that many people are far more knowledgeable than yourself. I notice one of the moderators caught you out making a guest post which is a sure sign of a lurker.
	Posted Yesterday, 06:24 PM #25861
Points: 300 Joined: 05 June, 2009, 06:48 AM Primary group: Bronze Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">isy Bronze Member	Marker Of all the posters I found conans to be a bit rude and stupid often, so it seems we have the same view of each other. And it is true in my opinion only, u site does not match other groups all that well. Conan seems to have a jealous streak. poor, fellow, u know it is a sin.
	Posted Yesterday, 06:39 PM #25863
Points: 1,815 Joined: 16 February, 2007, 07:38 PM Primary group: Silver Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">Conan Silver Member	Marker isy said Of all the posters I found conans to be a bit rude Perhaps because I cannot bear idiots lightly? Only a bit rude? I must be having an off week. isy said opinion only, u site does not match other groups all that well. Then where are these marvelous other sites PLEASE! I visit a few sites and when factual questions are asked people are invariably referred to this site. As I understand the traffic to this site absolutely dwarfs all the other sites. PS You did not respond to my statements about the FLRA, why some of the self rep areas are private and any of your Quiz results!
	Posted Yesterday, 06:51 PM #25864
Points: 300 Joined: 05 June, 2009, 06:48 AM Primary group: Bronze Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">isy Bronze Member	Marker U just admitted to being very rude, so why are u on this site? And people like myself do not link rude idiots or strange persons to other sites who may have to put up with u. U see, I always win
	Posted Yesterday, 07:42 PM #25866
Points: 1,815 Joined: 16 February, 2007, 07:38 PM Primary group: Silver Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">Conan Silver Member	Marker isy said U see, I always win That remark really says a lot about you. From some of your previous posts you are a legend in your mind. Your opinions about Family Law seem as ill founded as some of you ill researched other opinions. Is it possible that you could just answer rather than avoid: Why your comments about the FLRA Where are these marvelous other sites? Why don't you understand that the self reps have private areas to protect their posters Why lurk as a guest
	Posted Yesterday, 07:56 PM #25868
Points: 300 Joined: 05 June, 2009, 06:48 AM Primary group: Bronze Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">isy Bronze Member	Marker Your assumptions are amusing. In a game of wits, you will find it difficult to win, as I alway do. If you had have asked politely, I may have responded more fully, however, I can only repeat, I will not be directing you anywhere.

Conan/Viking/Peter Saxon of Sydney Embarrasses himself.

	Posted Yesterday, 04:07 PM #25408
Points: 1,715 Joined: 16 February, 2007, 07:38 PM Primary group: Silver Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">Conan Silver Member	Marker It is apparent this Chrystie is a stirrer presenting a selective and distorted view of what is happening. Firstly she is in NSW and then posts from Canada. Secondly her Child Support figures just don't add up in relation to her ex's income. Thirdly her costs of mediation are way off. Chrystie do you think the people on this site are as dumb as you?
	,
	Posted Yesterday, 06:13 PM #25415
Points: 700 Joined: 12 February, 2009, 05:44 PM Primary group: Silver Member ','auto','http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/themes/default/images/forum_navigation/members.png');" class="ocf_poster_member">Sunnyside Silver Member	Marker Conan, no comment on the first two issues you raised, but I think you've misinterpreted Chrystie on the third. I read her comment about the "$30K cost each" as being what it would cost if they DON'T settle at mediation. Which I believe is probably fairly on the money. I've heard of family lawyers saying to their clients that it will cost them the price of a car each to go to court.

Umm Conan, Chrystie must have got it right in thinking that you are dumb!! How embarrassing.

Peter Saxon is a liar.

---- Forwarded Message ----
From: Peter Saxon <peter_sxn@yahoo.com.au>
To: fathers4equality@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 30 August, 2008 7:03:49 PM
Subject: Re: [fathers4equality] letter from FAMILY LAW REFORM ASSOC. NSW Inc.

All this back and forth discussion is clouding some of the facts and more information.

Firstly Michael Green and the SPCA have been outspoken critics of Section 121. The FLRA website evens contains an article of why they think ‘it’ should be rewritten.

Coral Slattery heads up the FLRA which is an independent organisation and a member of the SPCA. Apart from providing many submissions to the HORSIP inquiry they do a lot of work on schools policies. There is a recent article about their attempts to get the Attorney General to implement a Nationwide schools information policy for the ‘other parent’.

Michael Green is a retired QC

Michael Green is the president of the SPCA

Family Courts in Australia are not secret Courts and this be may be why Michael Green did not respond in the way you though he should have. The Courts are open and Judgments are published. It is the anonymity of these publications that causes these organisations to rail against Section 121. That said ‘any’ judgment can be ‘anonymised’ and published.

Both these organisation house their web sites on the familylawwebguide portal and both have forums on that site. I am aware that very much tougher rules apply to posts made on flwg because unlike this closed email site, it is a public site and has some tough posting and moderator rules. The site also has ‘go forward’ groups on it that do not appear to tolerate whingers and what they constantly refer to as ‘hot air merchants’. Their agendas are clearly legislative reforms and legislative fine tuning. I suppose with the incredible success of flwg they want to keep it focused.

There are several articles on flwg about a recent meeting with the AG. At this meeting were Coral Slattery, Wayne Butler (Secretary SPCA) and Michael Green. One of the Agenda items was the mis use of AVOs to prevent contact. Other items included the SPCAs long standing opposition to the mis use of Rice and Asplund. This is all public material and freely available on the flwg site.

Have things changed? Well over the past week I have spoken to three Fathers that were in Goulburn Street. Within the same period of a week all three had orders that three years ago no one would have dreamed possible. Two of these were srl’s and part of the SRL Resources mob on the flwg. I am also a member of that group and I understand that is not a member of the SPCA although several of its senior people have been offered SPCA postions. If anything this is one group that because of their constant frontline experience can tell whether there have been changes in the way the Courts work.

Peter Saxon AKA Conan, Viking

---- Forwarded Message ----
From: Peter Saxon <peter_sxn@yahoo.com.au>
To: fathers4equality@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 13 November, 2008 8:41:38 AM
Subject: [fathers4equality] Getting the real truth out there

Well folks some of you are aware of the blog site that was attacking the FLWG and SPCA. This expanded into attacks on Dads on the Air, DIDS, F4E and some personal attacks on Debbie of M4E. Strange how all of these organisations have Shared Parenting as one of their platforms and there are no attacks on Anti Shared Parenting organisations.

Rather than anybody post a link to the evil site (and have people drive up its Google counter which is what the evil site is extremely proud of) goto

http://gettherealfa cts-gettherealfa cts.blogspot. com/

and add your comments.

Seems like if the evil harpies want to throw mud they will get it thrown back. If they don’t want to play Marquis of Queensbury rules they cannot expect other people to either.

Peter Saxon

Happy Birthday Conan/Viking!!!!

And a big happy april FOOL birthday to Peter Saxon aka Conan aka Viking aka Sneakydevil aka Loser.
Wow you're really getting on now and still so bitter and twisted.
Isn't it time you gave in and realised that you cannot ever win the battle and that women have a rightful place in society and that you cannot bully them forever.