MikeT whined:
"I think you are wrong, my understanding of the convention of human rights is that it says that children have the right to know and be cared for by their parents, or words to that effect, not that they have the right to a mother only. Society does support those children, taxes are put toward those children, as such every tax payer is supporting such children.I'm not aware of any right to be a full-time mother, where is this right documented and signed etc? I do understand that here in Australia there is the right to assistance for being a single a parent on low income, by way of the parenting payment single as an example, however I believe that applies to father's as well as mothers. Furthermore this right has limitations as to when the children reach a certain age. As I understand it, that the right to the pension is reduced unless some of that "Full-Time" is relinquished, as society here in Australia deems it not the right of the parent to have this support in total for children over that age, without contributing to society. "
Coming from a Pom MikeT, your comments are very mispaced on this thread. Just exactly how much have you cost the Australian taxpayer with your various court actions in relation to your ex wife and son? It's a pity you weren't billed for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment